Re: [RFD] Handling of non-UTF8 data in gitweb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > But doing this would change gitweb behavior.  Currently when 
> > encountering something (usually line of output) that is not valid 
> > UTF-8, we decode it (to UTF-8) using $fallback_encoding, by default
> > 'latin1'.  Note however that this value is per gitweb installation,
> > not per repository.
> 
> I think we added and you acked 00f429a (gitweb: Handle non UTF-8 text
> better, 2007-06-03) for a good reason, and I think the above argues that
> whatever issue the commit tried to address is a non-issue. Is it really
> true?

I think that UTF-8 is much more prevalent character encoding in operating
systems, programming languages, APIs, and software applications than it
was 4 years ago.

Also the solution implemented in said commit was a good start, but it
remains incomplete: $fallback_encoding is per-installation which is too
big granularity (there is `gui.encoding` per-repository config... but it
is about main not fallback encoding; best would be to use gitattribute
but currently there is no way to check attribute value at given revision).

The proposed

  use open qw(:std :utf8);

and removal of to_utf8 and $fallback_encoding would be regression compared
to post-00f429a... but the tradeoff of more robust UTF-8 handling might be
worth it.


Note that to_utf8 handles git command output part by part, not as a whole;
for UTF-8 vs latin1 (i.e. iso-8859-1) it does not matter though because
latin1 is very unlikely to be recognized as valid utf-8[1], and ASCII
characters pass-through for UTF-8.

[1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTF-8#Advantages

> > ... I guess
> > it could be emulated by defining our own 'utf-8-with-fallback'
> > encoding, or by defining our own PerlIO layer with PerlIO::via.
> > But it no longer be simple solution (though still automatic).
> 
> Between the current "everybody who read from the input must remember to
> call to_utf8" and "everybody gets to read utf8 automatically for internal
> processing", even though the latter may involve one-time pain to set up
> the framework to do so, the pros-and-cons feels obvious to me.

There is also a matter of performance (':utf8' and ':encoding(UTF-8)'
are AFAIK implemented in C, both the Encode part and PerlIO part).
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]