[POC PATCH 0/5] Threaded loose object and pack access

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Well, just to make sure we're all left in a confused mess of partly
conflicting patches, here's another angle on the same thing:

Jeff King wrote:
> Wow, that's horrible. Leaving aside the parallelism, it's just terrible
> that reading from the cache is 20 times slower than the worktree. I get
> similar results on my quad-core machine.

By poking around in sha1_file.c I got that down to about 10.  It's not
great yet, but it seems a start.

The goal would be to improve it to the point where a patch lookup that
already has all relevant packs open and windows mapped can proceed
without locking.  I'm not sure that's doable short of duplicating the
whole pack state (including fds and windows) across threads, but I'll
give it some more thought before going that route.



Thomas Rast (5):
  Turn grep's use_threads into a global flag
  grep: push locking into read_sha1_*
  sha1_file_name_buf(): sha1_file_name in caller's buffer
  sha1_file: stuff various pack reading variables into a struct
  sha1_file: make the pack machinery thread-safe

 builtin/grep.c   |   60 +++++-----------
 cache.h          |    1 +
 replace_object.c |    5 +-
 sha1_file.c      |  213 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 thread-utils.c   |   30 ++++++++
 thread-utils.h   |   23 ++++++
 6 files changed, 240 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)

-- 
1.7.8.431.g2abf2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]