Re: [PATCH 5/6] t1510 (worktree): fix '&&' chaining

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> This is also not "Additionally", as in "As a separate change that
> maybe should have been another patch but I am too lazy".  Rather, it
> is a necessary change that is part of the same task.  So I would
> write:
>
> 	Breaks in a test assertion's && chain can potentially hide failures
> 	from earlier commands in the chain.  Fix these breaks.
>
> 	'unset' returns non-zero status when the variable passed was already
> 	unset on some shells, so now that the status is tested we need to
> 	change these instances to 'safe_unset'.
>
> Erm, sane_unset, not safe_unset.  Did you even test this?

Thanks for careful reading and many constructive review comments.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]