Re: [PATCH 6/6] test: fix '&&' chaining

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:

> Breaks in a test assertion's && chain can potentially hide failures
> from earlier commands in the chain.  Fix instances of this in the
> following tests:
> 
> t3419 (rebase-patch-id)
> t3310 (notes-merge-manual-resolve)
[...]

The reader can read the diffstat, so I am not sure this list is very
useful.

With the space gained, it might be helpful to mention that this patch
only adds " &&" to the ends of lines and that any other kind of change
here would be unintentional, to put the reader's mind at ease.

[...]
>
> Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx>

The patch proper looks good, so if this is tested,
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]