Re: [PATCH] Add test that checkout does not overwrite entries in .git/info/exclude

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> ...
>>>> I think we should do this regardless precious being added or not.
>>>
>>> Because (see below)?
>>
>> Because it may potentially lose user's changes. Assume file "A" is
>> tracked and also ignored. Users may make some changes in A, then move
>> HEAD away without touching worktree, now HEAD does not see "A" as
>> tracked any more.
>
> Huh? "A" is initially tracked and the user modifies it. Moving HEAD away
> how?  "git checkout" would refuse to check out a branch that has different
> contents at "A", or is missing "A". So how can "now HEAD does not see 'A'
> as tracked any more" happen?

git reset <somewhere else>
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]