Daniele Segato <daniele.bilug@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Let me explain my idea with an example: > > An issue is discussed, a bug is acknowledged and a proposed solution is > discussed, this all happen in the mailing list, like it always has. > > Someone in the "git management" (the one that usually choose how git > should evolve) open a ticket, copy the relevant part of the mailing list > (or link to the discussion in the archive) and (optionally) place the > bug / feature / enhancement into a roadmap / milestone This step I wouldn't buy, if you count me as part of "management". But I suspect that curation of issues, prodding parties involved and closing inactive/stale ones can be done by volunteer project secretaries without requiring an authority to choose how git should evolve. cf. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/110117/focus=110129 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html