Robie Basak <robie.basak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I'm now confused about what it will do (which is why I need to look at > it again to make sure), but if it turns out to be easier to just handle > that one boundary point, would you accept a patch that eliminates just > that duplicate, on the basis that in Unix-land duplicate slashes are > perfectly acceptable to be left lying around? If that is the case, I would rather say we should even shoot for simpler. Just tell the patch generator not to include unneeded double slashes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html