Re: [PATCH 5/5] sequencer: revert d3f4628e

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jonathan,

Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Is this patch just reverting a previous patch?  If so, why doesn't the
> commit message use the usual format
>
>        Revert "<commit message>"
>
>        This reverts commit <unabbreviated object name>.
>
>        <explanation>
> [...]

I'd have loved to use 'git revert d3f4628e', but that ends up creating
a lot more work: recall the big move made by 1/5?  I'm trying to
"effectively port the inverse of the changes made by d3f4628e in
revert.c to sequencer.c" -- would you still like to see a git-revert
style commit message?  Don't you think it'll be misleading?

Sorry about the shoddy commit messages though: I'm polishing the
series now that I'm convinced that it's heading in the right
direction.  Hopefully, I'll have more to show soon.

Thanks.

-- Ram
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]