Dan McGee <dpmcgee@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I am not sure if this produces the identical result that was benchmarked >> in the original series. > I was not either when I wrote the patch, and I had hoped to confirm > the results you showed in the message of 1b4bb16b9ec. I actually am reasonably sure the result will not be identical, but I also do not think it matters. The differences would appear only for entries that have been filled earlier, which should be a minority. > unable to figure out how you generated those numbers so I wasn't able > to do so (and had planned to get back to you to find out how you made > those tables). Were you able to verify the ordering did not regress? No; I was hoping you would redo the benchmark using 5f44324 (core: log offset pack data accesses happened, 2011-07-06). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html