Re: [PATCH 0/5] Sequencer: working around historical mistakes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey,

Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:

> As described in the discussion following $gmane/179304/focus=179383,
> we have decided to handle historical hacks in the sequencer itself.
> This series that follows is one step in the right direction.

I'm not sure what the above means.  But let's see what the patches
say. :)

[...]
> 2. This series depends on rr/revert-cherry-pick, but doesn't apply to
> the current 'next'- sorry, rebasing is a massive pita due to 1/5.

Shouldn't it be based against rr/revert-cherry-pick, rather than
"next" which is more of a moving target?

Thanks,
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]