Re: [git patches] libata updates, GPG signed (but see admin notes)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> About the ugliness of the merge commit log messages, you have already
> learned to ignore them with "log --no-merges" ;-)

Absolutely not. I look at merges all the time. I never use
"--no-merges" except when I'm doing certain statistics (ie "How many
real changes do we have") or when I do release files.

But I actually think it's important that people write *good* merge
messages. I've berated some people for it when they just have

    Merge branch 'origin'

in their commit message, because I think a merge commit should say why
it happened or what it brought in.

> and the material the
> patch series I sent out adds are at the end, so "/^commit.*$" in less
> would hopefully work well enough in "log --no-merges" as well.

I agree that being at the end helps, but I do a lot of "git log
ORIG_HEAD.." etc, and I don't do a lot of "/^commit" searching.

The "/commit" thing I do tends to be because I do "git log -p" to see
patches, but at the same time am not going to read through
everything..

So I'd really like some way to not see it.

Ted suggested a NUL character in the commit message in front of the
"hidden content". What do you think?

                Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]