Re: [PATCH 0/4] fsck improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I think patches 1, 3 and 4 all are good ideas from a cursory look.

I am not sure what purpose patch 2 serves, though. When we find a checksum
mismatch for an object in a packstream due to a single-bit error, we would
still be able to salvage other objects in other parts of the pack as long
as we have a good .idx file, and in such a case, wouldn't it be better if
we attempted to find as many corrupt objects that we know we cannot
recover as possible and tell the user about them, so that they can be
skipped during the recovery process?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]