Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > I think it would be more logical to show those diffs as part of > git-status and perhaps git-commit, eg. > > git-commit --dry-run <commitoptions> > > shows the diff of what would be committed > > git-status --diff > > shows diffs of modified files in the working tree. > > This makes it more clear what each diff means. I'd rather say git-commit --diff or git-diff --commit -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html