>> Calling select() with max_fd+1 (== 0) will then not be appreciated by all >> implementations of select() so that case should probably also be covered by >> the 50ms sleep approach... > > Actually, the 50ms sleep was also implemented using select(0, ...) > before the patch. I tried to keep the previous behavior when curl does > not give us any information. > I assumed that the select(0, ...) was some portable way to sleep with > microsecond granularity. Upon a bit of research, it seems that select(0, ...) is indeed quite commonly used. So I'd just keep it as it was unless you know of a problem it causes. Since I'm new here, I don't really know what the next steps are for the patch, should I just wait? Or send it directly to someone? Best, Mika -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html