Re: Out of memory error with git rebase

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hannu Koivisto <azure@xxxxxx> writes:

> From the documentation I can't figure out any reason why one
> wouldn't always want to use -m.  Why is it not the default?  I
> think it's pretty much impossible for ordinary users to figure out
> that they need -m in a situation like this.

Because most people do not have too large binary blobs in the history, and
at least when "rebase" was originally written, merge-based rebasing was
way slower than patch-based one.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]