Re: [PATCH 3/6] revert: fix buffer overflow in insn sheet parser

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Check that the commit name argument to a "pick" or "revert" action in
>> '.git/sequencer/todo' is not too long
[...]
> Given that this function is going to be fixed properly so that it does not
> even need to use the "on-stack buffer", is this really necessary?

Right, I don't think it is.  Keeping a testcase sounds worthwhile,
though.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]