Re: [PATCH] git-explain

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

[...]

> As long as the safety valves don't come up _routinely_ in certain
> workflows, it seems OK to bypass them with a '-f' force switch. I
> suspect the best way to figure out if such workflows are in use is to
> put in the safety valves and see who complains; otherwise we're stuck
> with brainstorming workflows and deciding whether they make sense.

Problem is that nobody reads the manuals, next to nobody complains, and
when it doesn't work out via road A you try plan B. A might have been
exactly right, but it is blocked, and you'll never know if it is because of
fundamental reasons or by decree.
-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                    Fono: +56 32 2654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria             +56 32 2654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile               Fax:  +56 32 2797513
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]