On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:05:28PM +0200, Clemens Buchacher wrote: > On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 10:01:03PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > > > > Thanks, it's nice to have some tests. Overall, some of the tests feel a > > little silly, because the results should be exactly the same as fetching > > or pushing a local repository (so the "set-head" thing, for example, > > really has little to do with git-daemon). > > Hmm, yes. Actually, I thought I had found a bug with the failure of > "set-head -a". But now I see that in t5505 this treated like a > feature. It's not a feature, exactly. It's just documenting that we fail in the face of ambiguous HEADs. Arguably, the test should be switched to use text_expect_failure to document that we would prefer it the other way, but it doesn't work now. > Would it be difficult to support this over the git protocol? Maybe > I will have a look. It needs a protocol extension to communicate symbolic ref destinations. The topic has come up a few times, and I think Junio even had patches at one point. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html