Re: "trying out" gitolite with minimum impact on a system

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Philippe Vaucher
<philippe.vaucher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> After that, entirely within that user, you have an admin user and six
>> normal users, to do with as you please.  You emulate different users
>> simply by using a different username in the URL, like "git clone
>> u1:reponame" versus "git clone u2:reponame".
>
> Hum, except if I missed something the classic way to use gitolite is
> to always clone using the same user (git@host:repository.git), and the
> "real" identification is done by the ssh keys (which means that
> contrary to plain ssh you lose the ability to have two users with the
> same ssh key, which should never happen anyway).
>
> But maybe you're refering to an alternate authentification mechanism
> within gitolite I'm unaware of.

you should read "entirely within that user" as "entirely within that
new, possibly throw-away, Unix userid you created".  This is meant to
fit with the subject line's "minimum impact on a system" phrase.

regards

sitaram
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]