On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 17:18 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Jakub Narebski wrote: > > > The problem is that catering to old AsciiDoc (but still used by some of > > long-term-support Linux distributions) requires to have "SYNOPSIS" > > section... but there is no natural synopsis for non self-hostable web > > application, is there? > > I personally think something like > > SYNOPSIS > -------- > /usr/share/gitweb/gitweb.cgi > git instaweb > > or perhaps something like > > SYNOPSIS > -------- > http://<site>/?p=<project>.git;a=<action>;h=<object>;<parameters> > http://<site>/<project>/<action>/<object>?<parameters> > > would be best. This would be why I included a synopsis with my original submission. As this was supposed to be a description of the configuration files of said application it does not make much sense to put the executable in the synopsis. Please forgive me for attempting to make sense! -- -Drew Northup ________________________________________________ "As opposed to vegetable or mineral error?" -John Pescatore, SANS NewsBites Vol. 12 Num. 59 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html