Re: On removing files and "git-rm is pointless"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > If it doesn't match HEAD, we can't get it back as easily, so maybe that's 
> > the case when we want to have "git rm -f filename".
> 
> Hmph.  Wouldn't this lossage the same as the lossage we are
> removing the "safety valve" for, when "commit --only" jumps the
> index?

Losing an intermediate file state is much less severe than losing the 
latest file state I would think.


Nicolas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]