On Friday, October 07, 2011 09:51:46 am Michael Haggerty wrote: > I can't write more now, but Martin, if you have time to > benchmark 9944c7faf903a95d4ed9de284ace32debe21cdc1 > against your repository, I would be very interested to > learn the results. The fetch no longer seems to suffer from the large regression, it is now faster (~7m) than 1.7.7 (which was +15m). As a quick note, if I comment out the invalidate_cached_refs() call in write_ref_sha1() on line 2065 (on top of 9944c7), it is still much faster, only ~2m. Perhaps growing the array on the fly with many refs is still be too inefficient? -Martin -- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. which is a member of Code Aurora Forum -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html