Re: [PATCH 2/3] fetch: honor the user-provided refspecs when pruning refs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 06:37:13PM +0200, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:

> > I assume you mean s/tag/branch/ in the last line?
> 
> Yeah, maybe ref would be better?

Yeah, agreed.

> > Tests?
> 
> Good point.

It sounds like you already have a reproduction recipe for this, and for
the --tags thing in the next commit.

> OK, so take a step back and figure out what we want the rules to be
> before we call get_stale_heads. It does sound like a more elegant
> approach. I was trying to disrupt the callers as little as possible, but
> then again, there's only two. Will change.

Yeah. Sometimes we try hard to make a minimal patch, because it makes it
easier to review. At the same time, I think it's more important to make
the code clean if it needs it. Especially when there aren't many callers
to disrupt.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]