Re: [PATCH] fmt-merge-msg: use branch.$name.description

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonathan Nieder venit, vidit, dixit 07.10.2011 11:16:
> Michael J Gruber wrote:
> 
>> config based is so non-distributed, local in nature.
> 
> I don't follow.  Wouldn't a protocol change be enough to fix that, by
> sharing branch descriptions analagously to how refs themselves are
> shared?

I'd be surprised if we changed the protocol just to be able to share
some descriptions, when we have everything we need for sharing refs.
Also note that config is non-versioned etc.

But my main point here is that we should discuss the pros and cons of
each approach in context (the context of the original thread), and I
haven't heard many pros and cons for either.

Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]