Re: [PATCH] revert.c: defer writing CHERRY_PICK_HEAD till it is safe to do so

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> For that matter, I don't see how to distinguish "the merge did not
> even start" from "the merge had conflicts" when using
> try_merge_command().

I suspect you figured it out by now (sorry I have been tending other
topics and general project maintenance issues), but in case you haven't,
the exit values from the strategy backends are returned straight back to
the caller. The strategy backends are supposed to exit with 1 when they
left the conflicts, and 2 when they punted and did not touch the index nor
the working tree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]