Jay Soffian venit, vidit, dixit 04.10.2011 16:02:
> Teach git-log to support --children, which was added by f35f5603f4
> to the revision machinery, and by 72276a3ecb to rev-list, but
> was never added to git-log.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> log-tree.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/log-tree.c b/log-tree.c
> index 24c295ea1d..e7694a3a4c 100644
> --- a/log-tree.c
> +++ b/log-tree.c
> @@ -165,6 +165,14 @@ static void show_parents(struct commit *commit, int abbrev)
> }
> }
>
> +static void show_children(struct rev_info *opt, struct commit *commit, int abbrev)
> +{
> + struct commit_list *p = lookup_decoration(&opt->children, &commit->object);
> + for ( ; p; p = p->next) {
> + printf(" %s", find_unique_abbrev(p->item->object.sha1, abbrev));
> + }
> +}
> +
> void show_decorations(struct rev_info *opt, struct commit *commit)
> {
> const char *prefix;
> @@ -414,6 +422,8 @@ void show_log(struct rev_info *opt)
> fputs(find_unique_abbrev(commit->object.sha1, abbrev_commit), stdout);
> if (opt->print_parents)
> show_parents(commit, abbrev_commit);
> + if (opt->children.name)
> + show_children(opt, commit, abbrev_commit);
That means that "log --children --parents" will print out the parents'
sha1s, then the children's. Is that a good default format, or should we
somehow deal with the case when both are specified?
> show_decorations(opt, commit);
> if (opt->graph && !graph_is_commit_finished(opt->graph)) {
> putchar('\n');
> @@ -473,6 +483,8 @@ void show_log(struct rev_info *opt)
> stdout);
> if (opt->print_parents)
> show_parents(commit, abbrev_commit);
> + if (opt->children.name)
> + show_children(opt, commit, abbrev_commit);
> if (parent)
> printf(" (from %s)",
> find_unique_abbrev(parent->object.sha1,
And I guess we would like to test this...
Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html