Re: Does git have "Path-Based Authorization"?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Frans Klaver <fransklaver@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Putting on my business consultant hat:

> If you don't trust them, fix your trust and relationship, not some tool.

ACK. We're essentially talking about a social/political problem,
bot a technical one. Take my advise, solve the problem on the
layer it comes from.

The whole ideology of keeping individual devs on their little
tiny isle is to have the whole project structured into such
little islands in the first place. Meaning: a really strong
compartimentalization. This requires an strictly modular
architecture (which essentially means having completely
separate trees for the individual modules) and, of course,
good requirements engineering, contract-driven development,
etc, with all the associated role models, etc, etc.

What kind of project are we talking about ?
Tactical control or nuclear plant systems ?


cu
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/

 phone:  +49 36207 519931  email: weigelt@xxxxxxxx
 mobile: +49 151 27565287  icq:   210169427         skype: nekrad666
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]