Re: RFC: reverse bisect

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 06:09:24 +0200, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

One catch is that the run command assumes a successful exit is "good",
and anything else is "bad". Which makes:

  git bisect run make test

good for finding regressions, but is a little counterintuitive for the
yes/no thing (a successful exit means "no").

Then you would require a script that inverts the result, no? From my
point of view it's either that or add an option telling bisect run how
to interpret the results. In the latter case you could still consider
adding the regression/improvement qualification to bisect start. It might
help getting the mind set right.

Frans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]