Re: [PATCH] Print progress message to stderr, not stdout

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2006-12-04 09:17:16 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:

> On 02/12/06, Marco Costalba <mcostalba@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On 11/11/06, Karl Hasselström <kha@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Printing progress messages to stdout causes them to get mixed up
> > > with the actual output of the program. Using stderr is much
> > > better, since the user can then redirect the two components
> > > separately.
> >
> > This patch breaks qgit.
>
> Since there are other tools relying on a clean stderr, I think I
> would revert it and add a verbose flag and/or config option. Karl,
> any thoughts on this (since you sent the patch)?

I introduced this since I wanted to divert the output to a file, and
the progress message had no business being written to that file. But a
command line option to suppress progress messages would work just as
well if that's what git does.

-- 
Karl Hasselström, kha@xxxxxxxxxxx
      www.treskal.com/kalle
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]