Re: [BUG?] git fetch -p -t prunes all non-tag refs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 15:30 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ben Boeckel <mathstuf@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > When the --prune and --tags options are given to git fetch together, all
> > non-tag refs are pruned because only tags are looked at and when pruning
> > it appears as if the branches have disappeared and are therefore deleted
> > locally.
> 
> I would call that a bug, and it is not limited to the use of "--tags". For
> example, I suspect that
> 
>     $ git fetch --prune origin refs/heads/master:refs/remotes/origin/master
> 
> would prune remote tracking branches for "origin" other than "master".

This should fix it (in a way). Let's agree that it's a bad idea and
complain to the user. Looking at the surrounding code, I can't find
anything obvious that would break, and `git fetch --prune --multiple a
b` is allowed.

Patch on top of maint.

--- 8< ---
Subject: [PATCH] fetch: disallow --prune in combination with tags or refspecs

Pruning shouldn't be used when other options limit the references that
should be taken into account. For example

    git fetch --prune --tags origin
    git fetch --prune origin refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/*

Both these commands would remove references which do still exist in
the remote.

Print an error and exit if prune is selected at the same time as
either tags are selected or a refspec is given.

Signed-off-by: Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@xxxxxxxx>
---
 builtin/fetch.c |    3 +++
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/builtin/fetch.c b/builtin/fetch.c
index e422ced..158b20a 100644
--- a/builtin/fetch.c
+++ b/builtin/fetch.c
@@ -967,6 +967,9 @@ int cmd_fetch(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
 			if (!add_remote_or_group(argv[i], &list))
 				die(_("No such remote or remote group: %s"), argv[i]);
 		result = fetch_multiple(&list);
+	} else if (prune && (argc == 2 || tags != TAGS_DEFAULT)) {
+		/* The if (multiple) is above so we don't report multiple remotes as an error */
+		die(_("Pruning and limiting refs is not compatible"));
 	} else {
 		/* Single remote or group */
 		(void) add_remote_or_group(argv[0], &list);
-- 
1.7.5.2.354.g349bf



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]