Junio C Hamano wrote: > > I thought subject together with change would be clear enough. :) > > > > > >> Explanation of what you are fixing is totally lacking. > > > > The subject sums it up, if briefly. > > ... Sorry, that is not what I meant. > > You don't have to explain these to *me* specifically as a response > to this thread. What I meant was that your patch should have these > necessary descriptions in its proposed commit log message. IMO not so neccessary if one knows a little web and javascript, which is probably likely for a gitweb change.. It's a simple fix of links broken by manual URI manipulation that didn't consider fragments. Is the subject description really not enough? //Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html