Heya, On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 17:48, Martin Fick <mfick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hmm, I was thinking that too, and I just did a test. > > Instead of storing the changes under refs/changes, I fetched > them under refs/heads/changes and then ran git 1.7.6 and it > took about 3 mins. Then, I ran the 1.7.7.rc0.73 with > c774aab98ce6c5ef7aaacbef38da0a501eb671d4 reverted and it > only took 13s! So, if this indeed tests what you were > suggesting, I think it shows that even in the intended case > this change slowed things down? And if you run 1.7.7 without that commit reverted? -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html