Dmitry Ivankov wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Is this perhaps a good moment to also think about branch deletion? It might be a good temporal moment, but it's not quite the right thread for it. :) If someone wants to maintain a fast-import wishlist in a wiki somewhere, it sounds like it could be useful to some people (I prefer to read patches and stories about particular use cases, myself :)). >> That came up earlier as well, and thinking about that might give us >> some insights in how to deal with deletions uniformly. > > Also maybe marks deletion, getting mark sha1, resetting a mark with > explicit sha1. But most probably not tags deletion. > > And going much further on commands, following look nice to have: > - 'ls' storing result to a mark (to allow us not to compute sha1/store > object if we don't want to) > - marks namespaces (to keep ls mark separately, mark deletion will > do too, if it's only a single temporary mark). Maybe like ::nr:mark. Regards, Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html