Heya, On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 22:31, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I am not opposed to. We should do the usual "start from warning and then > deprecate" dance, but I do not think we would want to have a "I want the > old behaviour, please keep it" configuration, especially if we are talking > about a big version bump like 2.0. > > The first step would look something like this, on top of the previous > patch. Makes sense. I remember some sort of "this is for post 1.7.x" section in what's cooking at some point. Should we have some way to queue patches like this, or would someone have to resend after the appropriate release? -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html