Am 13.09.2011 21:34, schrieb Jens Lehmann:
> Am 12.09.2011 22:21, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> Instead, this patch structures the code like this:
>>
>> Yup, I agree that's the right way to do the other half of the issue.
>
> Ack from me too! I tested it on the repo with 3k refs and the time went
> down from 142s to 1s (when applied to 3793ac56b4, as later versions of
> master contain my other half which would skip Peff's code).
>
> On current master including my other half this takes 0.90s, while running
> with Peff's code on top of 3793ac56b4 it takes .96s. That is 6 hundreds
> of a second (7%) extra for not having to worry if one must run "git fetch
> --recurse-submodules" or not.
Just for the record: Martin Fick was so kind to run Peff's fix (without my
half) on his 100k refs repo that showed this regression. Here are the results
of some test runs:
1.7.7.rc0.189.gab72a
10m8.133s 9m7.971s 8m16.600s 13m57.821s
8m34.974s 8m41.527s
1.7.7.rc0.189.gab72a --no-recurse-submodules
10m43.833s 7m41.283s 8m17.889s 8m4.549s
8m12.668s 7m59.180s
The fastest runs are 8% apart, which is pretty much the same slowdown as in
the 3k ref repo. Looks like we do have O(n) now :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html