hoi :) On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 01:55:08AM +0100, Josef Weidendorfer wrote: > On Saturday 02 December 2006 21:24, Martin Waitz wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 12:17:44AM +0100, Josef Weidendorfer wrote: > > > After some thinking, a submodule namespace even is important for checking > > > out only parts of a supermodule, exactly because the root of a submodule > > > potentially can change at every commit. > > > > have you ever thought about the idea that the location may be an > > important thing to consider for your decision. > > Which decision, for what? Sorry, I do not understand. to check out, or not to check out. > What should such a general partial tree support look like? I suppose you > want to configure paths which should not be checked out. As long as you > say that a given submodule always has to exist at a given path, you are > right: then, you can say: "Please, do not check out this submodule" which > is the same as "Do not check out this path". You could say something like "do not check out anything below "test/". If then some submodule moves from "test/foo" to "build/foo", it will be checked out, because this module is now not only used for testing, but is needed for building in the new version of the supermodule. -- Martin Waitz
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature