On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 09:40:59PM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote: > +test_expect_success 'git branch -v t should work' ' > + git branch -v t && > + test .git/refs/heads/t && test -f ? Also, don't we have test_path_is_file which yields slightly prettier output (and maybe some portability benefits; I don't remember)? > + git branch -d t && > + test ! -f .git/refs/heads/t Ditto for 'test_path_is_missing' here. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html