On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 04:37:04PM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote: > Currently, "-m -d" is forbidden", but "-m -v" is "-m", same for "-d -v". > Do we want to keep it like that? Probably. I'll add the tests to 4/5. Yes, I think so. "-v" just means "be more verbose"; the fact that there is currently nothing to be more verbose about with "-m" and "-d" is irrelevant. It does make me a little nervous about the "'git branch -v' automatically means 'git branch --list -v'" patch, though. It closes the door in the future to us being more or less verbose about branch creation details (and while helpful, it creates a slight inconsistency in the interface). If we are adding "-l" anyway, is it really necessary? It's not much harder to do "git branch -lv" once that is in place. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html