Christian Couder <chriscool@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > If we start bisecting like this: > > $ git bisect start HEAD HEAD~20 > > and then we decide that it was not optimum and we want to start again like > this: > > $ git bisect start HEAD HEAD~6 > > then issuing the latter command might not work as it did before this patch. I didn't even know the above was supposed to work. It may have worked, but I think it was not by design but merely by accident. Besides, wouldn't it be the same to say "git bisect good" to further limit the suspect range, instead of giving the second, seemingly nested, "bisect start" that is not really nesting, which only confuses the users? Having said that, if you can resurrect the old behaviour without too much code churn, I wouldn't mind to look at the patch, but I am not sure if it is worth it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html