Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 08/27/2011 06:12 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote: >> And add tests that such refnames are accepted and normalized >> correctly. > > ...oops, I just noticed that you have committed a this same patch to pu > already, but with a better log message. Please retain that version. Thanks. Very much appreciated. It sometimes gets frustrating to see a re-rolled submission that ignores the fix-ups to messages and patches I make locally before queued to 'pu'. It is easy for me to say that they should fetch 'pu' to see what is queued before resubmitting, but I've been wondering if there is a better way to communicate back such differences, so that submitters can easily sanity check to see if my fix-ups are sensible, and to ensure that the re-rolled patches do not discard them by mistake before submitting. I could post what are queued in new topics back to the list as part of ack, but that would make the list too noisy to read. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html