Michael J Gruber <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> As suggested, I've just called it "--glob" for now. > > Well, again, what's the point in replicating > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/172228 > > and how is it different? > As I've mentioned, I've been in the middle of polishing that up. It is not unusual for a similar itch to happen to different people independently. If this were something you reposted even a WIP re-polish within the past two weeks, I would understand and even sympathise with your irritation, but please don't expect everybody to dig back FOUR MONTHS worth of mail backlog to find an topic that may or may not be abandoned by the original author. Perhaps we would need a weekly posting of topics people have posted, found to be not quite ready yet, and are still being polished and not abandoned [*1*]? Having said that, I still appreciate that you posted a link to the previous topic: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/172226 so that the discussions in this thread to scratch the same "itch" can benefit from the points raised in the previous thread that need to be considered. The old thread talks about renaming existing options and transition plans to make the "listing" mode of "branch" and "tag" more similar, which may be a good plan in the longer term. I however can see that teaching "--glob" to both "branch" and "tag" (in other words, "tag -l" would become a synonym for "tag --glob") an equally good longer term plan. [Footnote] *1* It does not have to be a weekly _posting_ on the list but can be a well-known Wiki page or even a bug tracker. Whatever medium is used for this purpose, there _must_ be a built-in mechanism to expire entries away that are inactive for more than some reasonable limit (say two to three weeks). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html