Re: Branches & directories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21 August 2011 13:53, Michael Witten <mfwitten@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 13:42 -0700, Hilco Wijbenga
> <hilco.wijbenga@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Isn't a branch simply a way to track changes separately?
>
> Well, what does that mean, really? You can certainly use branches to
> help you achieve that goal.

It means my commits are chained together separate from, say, master.

> In git usage, a `branch' is just a human-readable name for any given
> commit object; it points to a commit object, and you can change to
> which commit it points. Furthermore, to help you work with commit
> lineages, some of the git machinery updates these branches (or
> `pointers', if you like) automatically (for instance, when you make a
> new commit object with `git commit', then the `current branch' is
> updated to point to the newly created commit object).
>
> Of course, 2 different branches may be used to point to the same commit object.
>
> You should really think of your repository as a giant web of commit
> objects (or, more technically, as a directed acyclic graph where each
> node is a commit object); a commit object can point 'backwards'
> towards its parent commit objects. A branch (like `master') just
> points to one of these commit objects at any given time (that is, a
> branch just gives a nice human-readable label by which to reference
> one of these commit objects at any given time).

Yes, I agree with all of that (especially the last sentence). I don't
see how it changes the concept of a branch is, though. You are, I
think, simply listing the technical implementation.

> See here too:
>
>  http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2350536&cid=36903136

Because of the revision number you have to go "the wrong way". Any
single commit can have many children but a branch only points to a
single, unique commit (or at least that's how I understand it).

I feel like we're talking in circles. I get (and even agree with) what
you're saying but I don't see how it changes the concept of a branch.

In any case, what I'm more interested in is knowing whether we can
(optionally) add state (i.e. untracked/ignored files and unstaged
changes) to a branch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]