Hi Junio, Junio C Hamano writes: > Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> * rr/revert-cherry-pick-continue (2011-08-08) 18 commits >>> [...] >>> Will merge to "next". >> >> If this won't graduate to 'next' before the 24th, I have plenty of >> time to re-roll fixing all the issues that I've addressed in the >> beginning of the new series. > > I take it that you mean by "the new series" the 6-patch "Towards a > generalized sequencer" topic? Yes. > It is ultimately up-to-you. If you feel the fix-up is against glaring > errors in the earlier round that you would prefer not to see in the > history cast-in-stone, I am perfectly Ok to wait for a re-roll. On the > other hand, if they are mostly cosmetic fixes without major semantic > changes, it may be easier for everybody to see them fixed in-tree. Hm, I didn't think they were glaring errors. After reading your latest review about my '--continue' patch in the generalized sequencer, I've decided not to re-roll. Please merge 'rr/revert-cherry-pick-continue' into 'next' as usual. It'll take me some more time to think about my "generalized sequencer" series. Thanks. -- Ram -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html