Re: [bug-patch] rejecting patches that have an offset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric,

On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 17:16 -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> It would have saved me a lot of time if both 'patch' and 'git apply' 
> could be taught a mode of operation where they explicitly reject a patch 
> that cannot be applied without relying on an offset.

that sounds reasonable.  Can you send a patch or at least add a bug on
Savannah?

> It might also be nice if patch could learn the algorithm that appears to 
> match the git behavior, where when there are multiple points with 
> identical context (viewing just the context in isolation), but where 
> those locations differ in function location (as learned by the @@ header 
> line in the patch file), then the preferred offset is the one in the 
> named function, even if that is not the closes context match to the line 
> number given in the patch file.

Sounds interesting; a patch for that would be great as well.

Thanks,
Andreas

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]