Re: [PATCH 1/6] revert: Don't remove the sequencer state on error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jonathan,

Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Why bother,
> when the behavior is suppressed altogether later in the series?

Actually, this patch helped me while debugging:  I'd originally
intended for it to go into 'maint'.  Things have changed though- the
'sequencer-stable' is close to hitting 'next', and this series seems
to be close behind*; I'll drop this patch altogether during the
re-roll.

Thanks for making me explain this :)

-- Ram
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]