Re: [PATCH 0/6] Towards a generalized sequencer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:

> 2. Should I move it to sequencer.c and and modify it accordingly?
> It'll read Copyright (C) 2011 <Me>, based on builtin/revert.c which is
> Copyright Dscho, which in turn is based on git-revert.sh
[...]

Isn't it still the same built-in cherry-pick code, originally by Dscho
and improved over time by others?  The filename is irrelevant.

If you want to add your and Christian's names to reflect
multiple-cherry-pick and the restructuring, I guess that would be ok.
Better yet, if you want to remove Dscho's name to encourage people to
look at the commit log and get a richer story, just ask Dscho.

Asking would (1) show that you value his contribution and respect his
wishes and (2) allow him to say, "no, I really prefer to keep my name
there for such-and-such copyright-related reason".  Of course these
are only my own thoughts.  Maybe I'm too picky.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]