Andreas Ericsson escreveu: > Carl Worth wrote: >> >> See? Git _is_ harder to learn, and a user really cannot learn it >> without being careful about the index right from the very beginning. >> > > I'm not so sure about that. I came from CVS / SVN, although I've fiddled > quite a bit with other scm's as well. The two-step commit process of git > didn't terrify me at all, and I had used git at least a month before I > joined the mailing-list and found out that there's this thing called an I still don't know exactly how to operate adds and commits from the command line. I regularly get bitten by not supplying the -a and -i options. I'm coming from darcs, where you can select which each diff hunk to put in a commit separately. However, I almost never do that. I operate git like darcs, from the emacs support mode. I almost never do -a commits anyway, because with emacs (M-x git-status) it's more natural to make functionally distinct commits, at the risk of introducing non-tested tree states in the repository. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwen@xxxxxxxxx - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html