Re: working prototype of orphan parent commits as datastores (was: Storing additional information in commit headers)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



also sprach martin f krafft <madduck@xxxxxxxxxxx> [2011.08.02.2109 +0200]:
> Yes, absolutely. However, this would no longer be the case if
> x-*-ref could be used. Right now, I am just using orphan parent
> commits to avoid garbage collection.

refs/heads/master is a file, containing its payload in the first
line by format definition, right?

I mean: the storage is right there, isn't it?

Of course this opens a whole new can of worms: merging per-ref data.

-- 
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
 
"'oh, that was easy,' says Man, and for an encore goes on to prove
 that black is white and gets himself killed on the next zebra
 crossing."
            -- douglas adams, "the hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy"
 
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@xxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]