2011/7/26 Phil Hord <hordp@xxxxxxxxx>: > On 07/26/2011 06:37 AM, Jakub Narebski wrote: >> On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Phil Hord wrote: >> >> bridges (git-svn, hg-git, git-p4, etc.) >> I think they are included in "two-way interaction with other SCMs", >> but perhaps that should be made more clear. > > I think I just overlooked that one. > >>> IDE integration (Eclipse, Netbeans, etc.) >> This isn't strictly _git_ feature, and is in "12. What kind of Git tools >> do you use?" anyway. >> > Yes, it's not a git feature. But I'm curious how successful any IDE > integration is (as opposed to a GUI, for example). I haven't seen any > that use enough of the power of git yet, so I have been disappointed. I > suspect others have also, but I'm hopeful. I also think this is important, in my blog I've seen a bunch of people mentioning that Git's integration with IDE's is not as good as Mercurial. Putting this in the already existing list of tools would not cover missing IDE's being integrated, I think this should go into "20. In your opinion, which areas in Git need improvement?" -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html