Re: [RFD] making separate-remote layout easier to use

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jon Loeliger <jdl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 21:58, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> > ...
>> > I would prefer to see the upstream be able to publish a short
>> > description of each branch, where the repository owner can describe
>> > the policy of that branch,...
>> ...
>> I like this approach very much.
>
> I see how it is! :-)  When Shawn says it, it is to be liked.
> But when I allude to it a _year_ ago, I'm ignored.

Think of it not as a difference between you and Shawn, but as a
difference in me back then and me now, who finally saw the light
in your revelation after gaining a year's worth of experience ;-).

Seriously, I did not ignore it, and I think some of your other
comments in the message contributed to improved documentation.
When your message was posted, the issue Shawn raised in his
message was not so prominent, because people did not even get
that "Pull: refs/heads/pu:refs/heads/pu" line in their remotes/
file by default back then.  It was back in 0.99.9 era and a few
days after your message, a patch was posted to put more than
just the 'master' mapping in the remotes/ file clone creates.
It became an issue after that change but we lacked the resources
nor sense of urgency to do the out-of-band stuff, as we were
busy working on other things.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]